xdi message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Minutes: XDI TC Telecon Thursday 2011-06-23
- From: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@xdi.org>
- To: OASIS - XDI TC <xdi@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:45:15 -0700
Following are the minutes of the unofficial telecon of the XDI TC at:
Date: Thursday, 23 June 2011 USA
Time: 1:00PM - 2:00PM Pacific Time (20:00-21:30 UTC)
ATTENDING
Giovanni Bartolomeo
Drummond Reed
Joseph Boyle
THE IDEARPAD LINK FOR TODAY IS:
Please try to preface each of your comments with your name so the
transcription into the minutes is easier.
AGENDA
1) MOVING FROM METAGRAPH SYMBOLS TO METAGRAPH WORDS
See Drummond's email to the list and subsequent discussion:
Drummond
went over the email and the case for returning to the metagraph words
$is, $has, and $a in place of $, *, and ! as metagraph predicates.
Giovanni
has two potential concerns: 1) he is still worried about the use of $is
for both equivalence and inversion, and 2) he is still concerned that
there may be too much analogy with English, because the semantics of
English and the semantics of XDI are different. An example is RDF, where
the semantics are expressed primarily in mathematics. Giovanni feels
the focus should be primarily on the model when making this decisions.
Giovanni feels that while we should use English words as the "inspiration" for the choice of a $word, we should not rely on the syntax of English sentences to define the XDI semantics of the term, but rely on the XDI semantic model.
Joseph
suggested the option of allowing both metagraph symbols and metagraph
words to be used synonymously. Drummond is concerned that if we did
this, how we would determine which one is the canonical form, but is
open to a proposal as to how to do that.
We concluded that this needs more discussion among the TC members to arrive at consensus.
2) UPDATED LINK CONTRACT PATTERN
After
last week's discussion, Drummond suggested a simpler approach to
authority-specific link contracts. It is now documented it in the
latest XDI Graph Patterns & Statements docs:
3) NEXT CALL
The next call is next week at the regular time.
------------
ONGOING ISSUES LIST
Each of these is a candidate for the agenda for future calls.
* TRANSACTIONAL INTEGRITY FOR XDI (added 2011-03-24)
Since
versioning, as one example, involves multiple transactions that must
be commited as a group, we will need to address transactional
integrity. Specifically, we need to define how this will be handled at
the protocol level, vs. the implementation level.
* PROPOSED CONSTRUCTS/OPERATORS FOR XDI
Discuss the following wiki page originally posted by Giovanni:
* DICTIONARY STRUCTURE
Mike would like an example of the PDX dictionary as soon as we can do it.
* EQUIVALENCE SEMANTICS
Close on whether we need an additional $ word that is the equivalent
of Higgins Personal Data Model (PDM) semantics of h:correlation,
which is not as strong as $is.
* COOL URIS
Continue previous discussion about the use of standard RDF URIs in XDI:
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]