xdi message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Minutes: XDI TC Telecon Friday 2012-10-12
- From: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@xdi.org>
- To: OASIS - XDI TC <xdi@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:13:25 -0700
Following are the minutes of the unofficial telecon of the XDI TC at:
Date: Friday, 12 October 2012 USA
Time: 9:00AM - 10:30AM Pacific Time (16:00-17:30 UTC)
ATTENDING
Markus Sabadello
Giovanni Bartolomeo
Les Chasen
Joseph Boyle
Drummond Reed
Phil Windley
REGRETS
Bill Barnhill
THE ETHERPAD LINK FOR TODAY IS:
***** NEWS & UPDATES *****
--- PREP FOR UPCOMING INTERNET IDENTITY WORKSHOP
We'll discuss XDI-related sessions we are planning.
- Markus is planning to show the personal cloud desktop as a demo for Demo Day, and also as a conference session
-
Markus may also do a dedicated session on the XDI2 connector architecture
- Markus is also planning a Freedom Box demo
-
Phil is planning a cloud desktop session too
- Drummond may do an XDI dictionary and connector session
-
Drummond is also planning a Respect Network Founding Partners session
***** PRESENTATIONS *****
None scheduled.
***** DECISION POINTS FOR THIS CALL *****
This week's decision queue is the following set of proposals:
--- MULTIPLICITY (DRUMMOND)
We are still closing the loop with Bill, who was not able to attend today's call. Markus and Drummond will try to have a dedicated call with him next week.
--- XDI MESSAGING PATTERNS (MARKUS)
This is the formal proposal for the structure of XDI messages that we have long been using this wiki page to document.
Open issues that we discussed today:
- Which lines of the message pattern ABNF are required?
-
Will message and operation ordering be required?
Discussion of ABNF lines required
-
First line - needed for auditing - OPEN ISSUE
- Second line - OPTIONAL (if server URI is known)
-
Third line - datestamp - OPEN ISSUE (may be needed for security)
- Fourth line - link contract reference - REQUIRED
-
Fifth line - message operation - REQUIRED
Note that if a client does not know the link contract (fourth line), it can use the well-known public link contract ($public$do).
Discussion of message and operation ordering:
- Markus proposes that message and operation ordering be OPTIONAL for the client and REQUIRED for the server (i.e., if a client orders messages or operations, the server MUST follow the order)
-
If the client does not specify ordering, the rules currently on the wiki page apply.
***** DECISION POINT QUEUE REVIEW *****
No change - the priority is still to completely close on Multiplicity, and then on Message Patterns, followed by each Message Operation.
***** NEXT CALL *****
The next call is next week at the regular time.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]