Bill: answering your question about multiplicity requirements

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Barnhill, William [USA] <barnhill_william@bah.com> wrote:

Thanks for discussing the feedback at the meeting. Unfortunately (well, from an XDI point of view) I'll be on a cruise ship during the next call, without internet or phone. As a result I thought I'd send out some more thoughts in email.

That's fine -- we'll take your thoughts any way we can get 'em (and a cruise is sounding pretty good right now ;-)

On meeting all the multiplicity requirements, could someone point me to the wiki page or or doc that lists those? If so I'll see about sending an email that shows how my proposed syntax addresses them, or falls short.

I looked on https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiMultiplicity but didn't see them listed as explicitly as I think they should be, so I went ahead and added them to:

https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiMultiplicity/Discussion

It's the latest comment marked Drummond Reed 2013-03-17.

Note that they also refer to a new proposal on multiplicity syntax that came out of a suggestion of Joseph's on the last call. It's posted to:

https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiAbnf/Discussion

That comment is labelled Drummond Reed 2013-03-16.

=Drummond

xdi message