[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xdi] EquivalenceLinks - XDI Wiki
It is interesting that $ref $rep & (any others?) are in a way on a par as mutually exclusive ways of providing a value. Are these the only ways to provide a value? Should /$ref/ or /$rep/ and &/&/ be more similar syntactically? Another thought - since literal nodes (can we just say value nodes) have almost no properties other than their value (no outgoing arcs, only one incoming arc that must be &) they are very dissimilar to context nodes. Is there any point in having a separate node for the value? Suppose we just regard the value as a property of the parent context node instead of an extra arc and node - would we lose anything? On May 3, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Markus Sabadello <markus.sabadello@gmail.com> wrote: No, if you have a $ref or $rep arc in a context then that context must otherwise be empty. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]