[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Grouping translations across <trans-unit> elements
Hi, I have a question about best practice of the new XLIFF 1.2 grouping of translation units. In the XLIFF 1.2 draft it shows an example where the ending/beginning white space is not present in the source trans-unit but present in the translation of the merged trans-unit. How would the translator know that a whitespace should be added? Is there any best practice for this? If the whitespace between segments is in a skeleton file it will not end up at the correct place on back conversion and the merged source segments will be incorrect. A possible solution for this would be to add all whitespaces between translatable trans-units as separate trans-units with translate attribute set to "no" (or set to already translated) so white space information can be included in a merged segment. What are your thoughts on this? Regards, Fredrik ________________________________ Fredrik Corneliusson Software Engineer Language Technology Lionbridge Första Långgatan 30 S-413 27 Göteborg, Sweden Phone +46 31 7756088 www.lionbridge.com <http://www.lionbridge.com/>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]