OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Next steps regarding your very useful XLIFF 2.0 Public Review comments



On behalf of the TC, I want to again thank you for the very useful comments. As you know, we are tracking them here on our wiki https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF%202.0%20Public%20Review%20submitted%20comments%20tracker


In an effort to not fill your inbox with individual replies, I hope you don’t mind that I will reply to them, but comment number, in this single email.


Several were simply accepted at face value, and will be implemented (as documented on the wiki). Also, you and Yves have continued your discussions publically on the comment list.


I will address the remainder here.


csprd01 015 - Processing Requirements for XML PIs: This was also called to our attention in comment 013. We had an electronic ballot (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2432 ), and voted to say the Processing Instructions SHOULD be preserved.


csprd01 018 - Structure and Structural Elements: Glossary module: This is also covered in comment 024. We are very close to resolving this. We discussed this at the Face to Face meeting in London and came to consensus (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201306/msg00009.html), We then held a ballot (https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/ballot.php?id=2438) and voted to remove Glossary from File. In summary: A] make Glossary Module more expressive: 1) make <glossentry> extensible by both elements and attributes, 2) make children extensible by attributes, 3) Introduce id to be able to reference back from <mrk type="term">; B] Remove <glossary> from <file>


Ryan King is the owner of this topic and will be happy to follow up if you have further questions.


csprd01 025 - Format Style Module: I am grateful for this good advice. I will add a robust, more sophisticated example that supports images.


csprd01 026 - Metadata Module: This is also tied to comment 048. I think it is very good advice. I will add the example you suggest.


Prior to the second public review I will send you a link to the improved specification that incorporated the comments you sent, and I will ask for your opinion of the resolution of your comments.


Thank you,





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]