RE: Implemented your suggestion for csprd01 26 Metadata Module (thanks for the good suggestion)

["Schnabel, Bryan S" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com>]

Jörg,

Thanks for your reply. Your idea of having a public editor's copy of XLIFF 2.0 is a very good one.

David is the editor and is working very hard to keep an eye on the updates. I know he's occasionally distilling a fresh PDF in our source control.

I will ask David to reply on the possibility of exposing an editor's copy to the public. 

Thanks,

Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jörg Schütz [mailto:joerg@bioloom.de] 
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 10:51 PM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S
Cc: xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: Implemented your suggestion for csprd01 26 Metadata Module (thanks for the good suggestion)

Hi Bryan,

Examples are always good and help the reader/developer to better understand the spec. So I appreciate your addition very much.

By the way, is there a possibility to have a look at the in-progress specification, so to say access to the editor's copy of XLIFF 2.0?

Thanks and cheers -- Jörg

On July 19, 2013 at 23:53 (CEST), Schnabel, Bryan S wrote:
> Jörg,
>
> With regard to your comment on the Metadata module (which we are 
> tracking as csprd01 26 Metadata Module on our wiki, 
> https://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF%202.0%20Public%20Review%20subm
> itted%20comments%20tracker ), once again thank you very much for your 
> valuable feedback.
>
> I implemented your suggestion, and I think it helps the specification 
> to be more clear.
>
> I added an example of how to use the Metadata module to preserve 
> source XML attribute values and names in an XLIFF file, to facilitate 
> a roundtrip in cases where a skeleton is not used.
>
> I hope you find this to be a good implementation of your suggestion.
>
> Please let me know if you have further questions or comments on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>