[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-comment] TC Admin comments on XLIFF V2.0 CSPRD03
Woops. I should have tried harder to understand. That was a literal example, not a link to an example. The broken link does not matter.
Or put another way, never mind.
I was looking into "- On the cover page, in the Citation format section, there is extraneous text."
Your direction is pretty clear (thanks for that). But just to be sure, I tried to look at the example you site in this mail on the subject:
The example you site is broken (http://docs.oasis-open.org/obix/obixrest/v1.0/csd02/obix-rest-v1.0-csd02.html ).
Can you point to another example of a spec whose cover page complies with the new guidelines?
Members of the XLIFF TC,
TC Administration provides the following comments for the public review of the above Committee Specification Draft.
- In the PDF footer and at the end of the HTML, the copyright is incorrect. It reads:
Copyright © OASIS 2014. All rights reserved.
It should read:
Copyright © OASIS Open 2014. All Rights Reserved.
- In the first line of appendix B.1.1, the csprd02 is labelled "Committee Specification Drat" instead of "Draft.”
- In the Notices section, the copyright year says 2013 instead of 2014.
- On the cover page, in the Citation format section, there is extraneous text.
The first URL is preceded by the text: “Persistent link to this version: " We don’t put anything there, just use the link.
In the second URL, it starts with: "The latest version is available from:” Our template is just to use "Latest version:"
Also, periods are missing in the citation block after the list of Editors names, and after the URI for the current version.
Let me know if you have questions on any of these.
Check your work using the Support Request Submission Checklist at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/47248/tc-admin-submission-checklist.html