[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-comment] csprd03 - Enhanced conformance clause/statement related to "Backward Compatibility"
Thank you very much for this very useful comment. The TC will track the issue here:
We have logged your issue as csprd03 227, and we’ve assigned a TC member to own the issue. He will consult the TC as needed and determine the best resolution. You will be kept informed the whole time.
Your continued feedback on this, and any other issue you discover is appreciated and encouraged.
In section "2. Conformance” Comment Annotation" there is passage:
3. Backwards Compatibility
Conformant applications are NOT REQUIRED to support XLIFF 1.2 or previous Versions.
To me, additional information related to backward compatibility would seem valuable: Information that clarifies whether XLIFF 2.0 documents are (or under certain circumstances can be) backward compatible with XLIFF 1.2 or not.
Aside: Is “backward compatibility” probably a better wording than “backwards compatibility”?