[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xliff-comment] Comment annotations with "ref" and "value"
Having both attributes is not forbidden in the specification. It is even valid according to the core schema.
Â
Perhaps the specification needs to be modified to make having both attributes present at the same time an invalid case.
Â
Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya     Ârmraya@maxprograms.com
Maxprograms       Âhttps://www.maxprograms.com
Â
Â
From: David Filip <david.filip@adaptcentre.ie>
Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 at 12:01 PM
To: "Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@maxprograms.com>
Cc: <xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [xliff-comment] Comment annotations with "ref" and "value"Â
Hi Rodolfo,Â
Â
having both is invalid.
Cheers dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
Convenor, JTC 1/SG 1 Open Source Software, Convenor, JTC 1/SC 42/WG 3 Trustworthiness of AI | National mirror chair, NSAI TC 02/SC 18 AI | Head of the Irish national delegation, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 AI | Chair & Editor, OASIS XLIFF OMOS TCÂ | Secretary & Lead Editor, OASIS XLIFF TC | NSAI expert to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 38 Cloud Computing, ISO TC 37/SC 3 Terminology management, SC 4 Language resources, SC 5 Language technology
Moravia Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122
Â
Â
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:10 PM Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> wrote:
Hello,
Â
Description of Comment Annotations at http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/os/xliff-core-v2.1-os.html#commentAnnotation says that if âvalueâ is missing, there must be a ârefâ attribute pointing to a <note>.
Â
What should be considered the text of the comment when both a âvalueâ and a valid ârefâ attribute exist?
Â
Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. RayaÂÂÂ ÂÂ rmraya@maxprograms.com
MaxprogramsÂÂÂÂ Âhttps://www.maxprograms.com
Â
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]