RE: [xliff-inline] annotation type

["Estreen, Fredrik" <Fredrik.Estreen@lionbridge.com>]

Hi Yves,

Yes, now that we use that in other places it makes a lot of sense to be consistent and use it for <mrk> too.

Regards,
Fredrik Estreen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff-inline@lists.oasis-
> open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
> Sent: den 20 september 2012 15:07
> To: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xliff-inline] annotation type
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Looking at the inline markup I noticed that we have currently the following
> for the type attribute for <mrk>:
> 
> - generic
> - term
> - comment
> - x-<userDefinedType>
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to use the same pattern as the code type for the
> user-defined values, namely:
> 
> <prefix>:<value>
> 
> Where:
> The prefix is a string uniquely identifying a collection of values for a specific
> authority.
> The value is any string value defined by an authority.
> 
> ?
> 
> Cheers,
> -yves
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-inline-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-inline-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>