RE: [xliff-inline] XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - Dec-11-2012 - Summary

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

Thanks Fredrik.
-yves

-----Original Message-----
From: Estreen, Fredrik [mailto:Fredrik.Estreen@lionbridge.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:30 AM
To: Yves Savourel; xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - Dec-11-2012 - Summary

Hi Yves, All,

I have committed the change to the PR. I fixed one more referral to existing target in the case of no existing target. I also added explicitly that it is ok to add translatable text.

Regards,
Fredrik Estreen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org 
> [mailto:xliff-inline@lists.oasis- open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
> Sent: den 11 december 2012 16:25
> To: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee 
> Teleconference -
> Dec-11-2012 - Summary
> 
> XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - Dec-11-2012 - 
> Summary
> 
> Every second Tuesday of every month at 15:00 UTC 7:00am PT, 8:00am MT, 
> 10:00am ET 3:00pm London, 4:00pm Berlin
> 
> Presents: Yves, Fredrik
> 
> 
> 
> === Type attribute.
> 
> Summary is here:
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201210/msg00013.htm
> l
> 
> ACTION ITEM: yves to update spec to reflect the type/subtype change
> -> done.
> 
> Y: No further action required.
> 
> 
> === Names.
> 
> ACTION ITEM: Yves to post email for new names proposal.
> -> done: first:
> -> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201211/msg00005.
> -> ht
> -> ml
> then: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-
> inline/201212/msg00000.html
> Notice is now in the draft.
> 
> Y: No further action required in the SC.
> 
> 
> === Draft.
> 
> Latest draft is here:
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/x
> liff-
> 20/xliff-core.pdf
> 
> Jung expressed concerns about some of the PR here:
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00024.html
> 
> Fredrik answered here:
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00026.html
> 
> Y: I think this discussion does not prevent us to submit the draft to 
> the TC where the discussion can continue and possible modifications can take place.
> At this point there is no reasons to keep the current document at the 
> SC level.
> F: agreed.
> 
> Text change to address the first point of Jung old = "• User agents 
> may leave the existing target unchanged."
> new = "• User agents may leave the segment without target."
> 
> ACTION ITEM: Fredrik to change the specification.
> 
> Preventing segmentation issue:
> F: position initially based on thinking XLIFF as the processing format 
> .. may change.
> Y: This is a topic for the TC.
> 
> Y: Moves to put send the current draft (plus the changes above) as the 
> final proposal from the SC to the TC.
> F: Second.
> The motion passes unanimously.
> 
> ACTION ITEM: Yves to make an informal ballot for all the group so they 
> can record their opinion.
> The ballot is informative only. The motion has passed already.
> 
> F: not sure if XLIFF doc are stand-alone or not (requires the schema 
> or not?)
> Y: think it's fine stand-alone
> F: this is about the default values
> Y: I see
> F: schema provides the defaults
> .. something for TC to discuss
> 
> 
> === Any other business
> 
> Y: This should be the last SC call.
> .. thanks to Fredrik and all for the good work.
> 
> 
> -end
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-inline-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> xliff-inline-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>