OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff-omos message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xliff-omos] XLIFF OM diagrams


Hi,

I think for the abstract model it makes sense to have them in original data – if for JLIFF we decide to linearize as well that is different question. I do believe that this small complexity is very valuable if you have heavily tagged content.

Patrik

 


 
www.sdl.com


SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.
Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.

From: xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 6:09 PM
To: Lucian Podereu <lpodereu@sdl.com>; xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff-omos] XLIFF OM diagrams

 

Thanks Lucian.

It looks quite good.

 

I have one comment, but it’s not anything fundamental:

 

I’m trying to see which representation is better for the original data of the in-line codes.

 

-   A separate table and dataRef property on each inline code object (like in the diagram)

-   Or a data property directly on each inline code object.

 

From a processing viewpoint it seems having the data part of the inline object makes add/delete/update operations easier. But there are also a few advantages with a separate table.

 

Anyone has opinions on this?

 

Thanks,

-yves

 

 

From: xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Lucian Podereu
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 5:22 AM
To: xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff-omos] XLIFF OM diagrams

 

Hi,

I've updated the diagram, with some feedback from the last meeting.

Regards,
 Lucian.


 Image removed by sender.
www.sdl.com

 

 

SDL PLC confidential, all rights reserved. If you are not the intended recipient of this mail SDL requests and requires that you delete it without acting upon or copying any of its contents, and we further request that you advise us.

SDL PLC is a public limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 02675207.
Registered address: Globe House, Clivemont Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 7DY, UK.

 

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

 

Click here to report this email as spam.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]