[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-omos] Modules and extensions
Felix I think one of the main concerns/unknowns with json-ld was that it couldn’t model the complexities of jliff. For example, more than one ‘active’ namespace within
the same ‘element’ scope. Despite FREME I couldn’t answer that question. Perhaps you can. My recollection is that json-ld namespaces are defined at the ‘head’ of a section and applies to
everything within that level of hierarchy: e.g. @context in FREME. Phil From: xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff-omos@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki Hi Yves, all, previously in this thread people said they are worried about ad hoc created namespace resolution systems. I understand the worry about json-ld complexity, but at least it is a standard solution, with many libraries available. Just my two
cent ... (I understand that it is likely that people won't go the json-ld path, this is just my last attempt to mention this approach) - Felix 2017-05-25 4:28 GMT+02:00 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]