[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-omos] Modules and extensions
Thanks for the reminder Felix. Like Phil, I’m just wondering about the cost of JSON-LD when various namespaces are mixed in the same object. Looking at examples such as those here: https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api-best-practices/#dfn-json-ld-context, the resolution of the namespaces seems relatively complicated and changes the object structure. But I’m probably missing a lot. Cheers, -yves Yves Savourel From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:felix@sasakiatcf.com] Hi Yves, all, previously in this thread people said they are worried about ad hoc created namespace resolution systems. I understand the worry about json-ld complexity, but at least it is a standard solution, with many libraries available. Just my two cent ... (I understand that it is likely that people won't go the json-ld path, this is just my last attempt to mention this approach) - Felix 2017-05-25 4:28 GMT+02:00 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]