[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...
-----Original Message-----
From: Lieske, Christian [mailto:christian.lieske@sap.com]
Sent: 01 March 2002 14:04
To: 'xliff-schemas@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...Hi Enda,I share your interpretation of the minutes from the last TC (ie. 'the mainTC should decide'). The ambiguity from my point of view is the phrase'case by case basis'. My understanding was that our subcommitteeshould send out a document that contains all of the enumeration-typeattribute values, and that the main TC should decide for every attribute,whose list of values currently consists of 'recommendations' should bea) closedb) a mixture of 'legal/recommanded' values and user-defined valuesc) completely user-definedBest, Christian-----Original Message-----
From: Enda McDonnell [mailto:EndaMcD@alchemysoftware.ie]
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2002 19:51
To: 'xliff-schemas@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...Hi guys,
Minutes attached. I will send these minutes as-is to the main group.
Bye the way, on re-reading the minutes from the last TC meeting, the following is how the issue of suggesting lists to the main group was minuted on the 19th Feb. It is ambiguous, and I wasn't there to recall, but I read the 'whole group' here as the main TC group, am I wrong? This is not what we decided today.
"The issue of whether recommended lists should be open or close was raised.
It was decided this should be decided on a case by case basis by the whole
group. Eric will provide a list of these for discussion."Regards,
Enda
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC