Re: Re: [xliff] XLIFF migration policy

[John Reid <JREID@novell.com>]

Hi Tony,

1. In reference to the "certification" versus "modification" in the
"Rules for Major vs. Minor releases:" section, your point is taken.
Maybe "validation" would be a better choice?

2. In reference to the "Rules for Name Changes" section, I agree about
the wording. Is the following more acceptable?

"The names of required elements and attributes will not be changed.
However, a new element/attribute may be added that has different 
semantics. The new element/attribute would replace the current
required
element/attribute and may or may not be required and the replaced 
element/attribute would no longer be required."

cheers,
john