[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] XLIFF 1.1 Update
Looks better than my wording. I'll update it. -----Original Message----- From: John Reid [mailto:JREID@novell.com] Sent: Fri, October 17, 2003 12:53 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [xliff] XLIFF 1.1 Update Hi Yves, Thanks for taking care of this. Under <note> it says, "The optional annotates attribute indicates if the note pertains specifically to the <source> or the <target> element." Since <note> is valid in elements other than <trans-unit>, those values are not always valid. Maybe we should say something more like, "The optional annotates attribute indicates if the note is a general note or in the case of a <trans-unit> pertains specifically to the <source> or the <target> element." Wording to that effect should also be used in the definition of the annotates attribute. What do you think? -john >>> "Yves Savourel" <email@example.com> 10/17/03 9:40:46 AM >>> Hi everyone, Attached the updates specification and XSD with the following modifications: - addition of the attribute annotates with three values: source, target and general, general being the default value. The attribute annotates is an optional attribute of <note>. - change all id attribute type to xsd:string. I've changed the wording in the specification as well and added there a small note to warn about spaces. Those files are not posted in the official document area yet. Please, have a look and make sure I got everything right. Thanks -yves To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/leave_workgroup.p hp.