[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] A minor ambiguity in the xliff spec
Hi Matt, > I want to represent match quality as a percentage > Do I say: > match-quality="95%" > or > match-quality="95" > Or should this not matter I would say probably "95%". Just because there is such an example in the spec (in the main description of alt-trans (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/xliff- specification.htm#alt-trans). You are right value is not really defined, we probably need to make this more clear for interoperability. Cheers, -yves ________________________________ From: Matthew Lovatt [mailto:matthew.lovatt@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:43 AM To: xliff Subject: [xliff] A minor ambiguity in the xliff spec Extract from current 1.1 spec match-quality Match quality - The match quality of the <alt-trans> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/cs-xli ff-core-1.1-20031031.htm#alt-trans> element is tool specific and can be a score expressed in percentage or an arbitrary value (e.g. match-quality="high"). ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- I want to represent match quality as a percentage Do I say: match-quality="95%" or match-quality="95" Or should this not matter Mat
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]