[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [xliff] best practice: should extraction process create targetelements?
Not sure if this came through on the XLIFF
list or not. My apologies if this is a repeat. From: Rodolfo
M. Raya [mailto:rmraya@heartsome.net] On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:16 -0500, Doug Domeny wrote: Should the extraction process create a
target element with a copy of the source in it? 1. No,
the extraction process should only create the source tag.
1. Yes,
but the target should be empty and the state=”needs-translation”.
1. Yes,
the target should be a copy of the source and the state=”needs-translation”.
·
·
Trados Tagged RTF
files and TTX files present these cases: ·
Segments that have
fuzzy translation from Trados. The filter has to: ·
add the target text
from Trados in a <target> element ·
set the
"state" attribute of the new <target> to a suitable value ·
store the match
quality somewhere, in a <note> element for example ·
Segments that have a
100% match. The filter has to: ·
add the target text
from Trados in a <target> element ·
set the
"state" attribute of the new <target> to a suitable value ·
optionally,
set the "approved" attribute of the <trans-unit> to
"yes"
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]