Bryan,
The schemas are
attached. Thanks for reviewing them. It’s always good to have another pair of
eyes (and XML processors) check things out.
The <tool>
element now has an extension point for
attributes.
From: Tony
Jewtushenko [mailto:tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:31
PM
To:
bryan.s.schnabel@exgate.tek.com
Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org;
ddomeny@ektron.com
Subject:
RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec revisions
Thanks for volunteering. I
agree it's a good idea to QA the schema and samples. Please get the
results with any revisions back to me by close of business Monday so I can get
the ballot marerials together in time for the ballot on
Tuesday.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
bryan.s.schnabel@exgate.tek.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@exgate.tek.com]
Sent: 12 May 2006
13:18
To:
tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com; ddomeny@ektron.com
Cc:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec
revisions
In
preparation for Monday's deadline for final revisions, and Tuesday's ballot,
I'll be happy to run XML diagnostics on the revised XSDs and XLIFF sample
files. I know that Doug will do excellent work, but it would probably be
a good to have a second person do a final QA to ensure XML validity. If
for no other reason, it will put a little mileage on the schema and samples
before the ballot goes out.
Doug, if
you want to take me up on my offer, I'll be available to run tests today and
Monday. (this will be a good time for me to fix the strict sample
"almost everything," where you pointed out that the tool attribute
in the phase element is deprecated.)
-----Original
Message-----
From: Tony
Jewtushenko [mailto:tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 9:35
AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S;
ddomeny@ektron.com
Cc:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org; asgeirf@gmail.com
Subject: [xliff] More XSD & Spec
revisions
Asgeir has idendtified a number of other
minor problems with the spec & XSD. I've noted the revisions
required below, but if anyone has any further input please provide it as
soon as possible. I suggest that Doug go ahead and make the necessary
changes to the XSD and I'll send a revised spec later today. We'll need
final revisions done by Monday.
Again thanks for Asgeir for his careful
review and identification of the spec and
XSD.
Hopefully this represents the last of the
spec issues.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Asgeir Frimannsson [mailto:asgeirf@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 May 2006
01:31
To: Tony Jewtushenko
Subject: More XLIFF spec
corrections
Some further minor corrections to the
XLIFF spec:
2.5.1. Adding Elements:
<xliff>
and <seg-source> are listed as extension points - they are not
in the
schema
(the listed <xliff> element above also has an incorrect html
anchor link)
TONY> this needs to be corrected in
the spec. I'm sure we added an extension point at xliff and I'm somewhat
certain seg-source should also have one.
2.5.2. Adding
Attributes:
<xliff> and <seg-source> support non-xliff
attributes in the schema,
but are not listed here.
(This probably
relates to the issue above - a mixup when updating the spec?)
In addition,
<tool> is currently listed, but does not support
non-xliff attributes
in the schema.
TONY>I'll revise the spec but tool
needs to be updated in the schema.
2.5.3. Adding Attribute Values
Again,
alttranstype and reformat supports user defined values ('x-')
in the
schema, but are not listed here.
TONY>I'll revise the
spec
Element detail for
<target>:
Missing description of equiv-trans and equiv-trans is not
listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the
spec
Element detail for
<group>:
Missing description of merged-trans and merged-trans is not
listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise the
spec
Element detail for
<alt-trans>
No anchor on <seg-source> element in
description
TONY>I'll revise the spec