Re: [xliff] Change in the specs regarding TMX

["Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@heartsome.net>]

On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:53:40 -0400 (EDT)
Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org> wrote:

> Rodolfo,
> 
> As to the selection of a target for a normative reference, it matters
> a lot whether the "normativeness" relates to specific content
> in a target document, or just "whatever that document might say
> at the time of your reading it..."  Creating the citation should
> make it clear what's intended.

Hi Robin,

Thanks for your comments. 

In this case, TMX is a non-normative reference and if we point the link
to TMX's home page, we will be consistent with the reference to SRX, the
other standard from LISA mentioned in our specs.

The only relevant reference to a given version of TMX says: 

   "At the time of this document's authoring, TMX 14b does not support
   <g> and <x/> inline tag equivalents." 

This reference will be obsolete when the new version of TMX is finally
released, so I don't expect any problem if we point to TMX's home page
instead.

FWIW, current link points to the latest version of TMX, not to a
specific version of it.

Best regards,
Rodolfo
-- 
The information in this e-mail is intended strictly for the addressee,
without prejudices, as a confidential document. Should it reach you,
not being the addressee, it is not to be made accessible to any other
unauthorised person or copied, distributed or disclosed to any other
third party as this would constitute an unlawful act under certain
circumstances, unless prior approval is given for its transmission. The
content of this e-mail is solely that of the sender and not necessarily
that of Heartsome.