[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] ULI and XLIFF TC Scope: Voting Action Required
Hi Helena, Thank you for this very useful report. It sounds like you had a fruitful meeting. Let's consider your request that members reply to your note by end of day EDT May 9 as a "straw poll" for now. I will be happy to initiate an official ballot on your behalf (compliant with all the necessary OASIS mechanics), if you'd like. I think I have an idea of the specifics, but please send me the exact wording of the ballot you desire, in language along the lines of this mythical example: "Please respond with a 'yes', 'no' or 'abstain' vote to the following: 'The XLIFF TC shall begin all of its meetings with a reading of the charter'." Once we get the words straight, I'll kick off the ballot right away (including a clear duration). I see no problem in completing this ballot before the next TC meeting. Thanks for taking the initiative to sort out these important and relevant issues. - Bryan From: Helena S Chapman [mailto:hchapman@us.ibm.com] Hi. Just had a call with Yves, Christian, David F, David W, Steven, Lucia, and Peter. I want to summarize the conversation. Essentially, we agreed that segmentation standards should be worked on within the new Unicode ULI TC: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]