RE: [xliff] Liaison report for TC 37

["Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@maxprograms.com>]

Hi Yves,

I remember that in a meeting after the XLIFF Symposium we decided not to allow custom extensions but I can't tell you when that happened. 

Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya   <rmraya@maxprograms.com>
Maxprograms      http://www.maxprograms.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@translate.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:53 AM
> To: 'Peter Reynolds'; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Liaison report for TC 37
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> > I have written the attached report which I would
> > appreciate you looking at and coming back if there
> > is anything you disaprove of.
> 
> Thanks for sharing the report.
> 
> It seems some of the statements about what 2.0 will be are a bit premature:
> 
> "(XLIFF 2.0)... will add some new functionality. The approach being taken is
> that XLIFF 2.0 will be modular. Tool providers will not be able to create
> extensions which lead to different flavours of XLIFF. The tool providers have
> supplied the XLIFF TC with details of the extensions to XLIFF which they have
> developed and these will be incorporated into XLIFF 2.0 where appropriate."
> 
> For example I don't recall that we formally decided to not allow extensions in
> 2.0, or that we decided to incorporate new functionalities, or incorporate
> some specific tool extensions.
> 
> I'm not saying 2.0 will not be as you describe, but simply that we are still very
> much discussing all those aspects (except maybe the modularity approach).
> Maybe changing most of the "will" by "may" would be more accurate.
> 
> Cheers,
> -ys
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php