[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Liaison report for TC 37
Hi All, We've not had an official vote to not allow custom extensions. We've had a lot of discussions about how this would solve a lot of problems regarding conformance. But I cannot recall that we've discussed the implications of removing extensions (for me, I like the idea, but many, many questions would need to be answered first). - Bryan ________________________________________ From: Rodolfo M. Raya [rmraya@maxprograms.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 4:31 AM To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Liaison report for TC 37 Hi Yves, I remember that in a meeting after the XLIFF Symposium we decided not to allow custom extensions but I can't tell you when that happened. Regards, Rodolfo -- Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@translate.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:53 AM > To: 'Peter Reynolds'; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xliff] Liaison report for TC 37 > > Hi Peter, > > > I have written the attached report which I would > > appreciate you looking at and coming back if there > > is anything you disaprove of. > > Thanks for sharing the report. > > It seems some of the statements about what 2.0 will be are a bit premature: > > "(XLIFF 2.0)... will add some new functionality. The approach being taken is > that XLIFF 2.0 will be modular. Tool providers will not be able to create > extensions which lead to different flavours of XLIFF. The tool providers have > supplied the XLIFF TC with details of the extensions to XLIFF which they have > developed and these will be incorporated into XLIFF 2.0 where appropriate." > > For example I don't recall that we formally decided to not allow extensions in > 2.0, or that we decided to incorporate new functionalities, or incorporate > some specific tool extensions. > > I'm not saying 2.0 will not be as you describe, but simply that we are still very > much discussing all those aspects (except maybe the modularity approach). > Maybe changing most of the "will" by "may" would be more accurate. > > Cheers, > -ys > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]