[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [xliff] Element simpleNote
Hi all, See below one contribution to the simpleNote discussion that I forgot to forward. Cheers, -yves From: Felix Sasaki Hi Yves, again, feel free to forward this. My proposal to resolve this would be: use the definition of the ITS note at http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#locNote-definition this is independent of the actual usage, as an attribute / element / with or without XPath. Say then that you implement the definition following ITS locally, but not ITS globally, for the reasons about XPath you mentioned below. The value of the above would be that we have clear paths of conformance: an implementation of ITS in XLIFF conforms to the definition and the local implementation, but it potentially adds another, non XPath based option. Best, Felix 2011/7/19 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> > a. Why can't we use existing standards such as W3C ITS in XLIFF? If we go with ITS, for a "simple note" we can use the its:locNote attribute without anything else. It goes on the element you want to annotate. We could still control which elements allow it or not using the schema. If we were to match the current locations we would allow its:locNote on <segment>, <unit>, <source> and <target>. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]