[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Re: Ballot on Feature Approval Procedure, XLIFF 2.0 program Charter Draft v0.4 committed to SVN
Hi David, all, > Only the Owner can suggest reconsideration of an > item in section 3. > [Alternative additional conditions for reconsideration > of items in section 3:] > EITHER > 1. Not sooner than 4 months after the item was > placed in Section 3. > OR > 2. Majority of *all* voting members needed (via kavi to > all eligible, or also possible if the meeting majority is > at the same time the majority of all current voting members). > OR > 3. No additional conditions. A suggestion: How about no conditions at all? Anyone can suggest reconsideration of an item in section 3 and we do a simple ballot on that. Why putting "artificial limitations" (in my opinion) to do things? The bottom line is that the group always end up deciding anyway. Just my 2 cents. -yves
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]