xliff message

Subject: RE: [xliff] Uniqueness of language pair

From: "Schurig, Joachim" <Joachim.Schurig@lionbridge.com>
To: "xliff@lists.oasis-open.org" <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:39:35 +0000

Hi Rodolfo,

> Nevertheless, I admit that language service providers may prefer multilingual XLIFF documents.

No, I do not think so. The added synchronization complexity would not fit well into workflows. We would actually (see Fredrik’s comment earlier today) prefer a bilingual standard.

Regards,

Joachim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xliff] Uniqueness of language pair
  - From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

References:
- Uniqueness of language pair
  - From: "Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@maxprograms.com>
- Re: [xliff] Uniqueness of language pair
  - From: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>
- RE: [xliff] Uniqueness of language pair
  - From: "Rodolfo M. Raya" <rmraya@maxprograms.com>