[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Metadata extensibility ballot
I thought it might be useful to reiterate some of the main arguments supporting each of the options in the extensibility ballot. It’s a complex area, but a number of good points were raised during Tuesday’s call. Since there was no support
for “namespaces only”, it’s clear that there is strong support for elements to a greater or lesser degree. Our preference is for a definitive decision in this area, rather than a hybrid approach. My colleagues and I voted for ‘elements only’, as we see more benefits with this approach and it fits the majority of the business scenarios we’ve considered. Here’s a summary of how we perceived the arguments for both sides.
Thanks, Kevin. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]