[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Locked vs translate
yes | The segment can be translated (default). |
locked | The segment MAY be translated but SHOULD NOT. |
no | The segment MUST NOT be translated. |
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [xliff] Locked vs translate
From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Wed, October 03, 2012 10:21 am
To: <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>
Hi all,
Since this topic is being discussed for 2.0.
Here is an example where a tool uses an extension to provide a 'locked' information.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okapitools/message/3285
This specific case could probably be handled with 1.2 approved='yes', but it illustrates that some users do feel that using translate='no' is not the proper solution in all cases.
The solution that Fredrik proposed yesterday (translate="yes|no|locked") may be workable.
For "no": not translatable. For "yes|locked": translatable, but possibly currently protected. The interest is that it is reversible without affecting the translate='no' entries.
And you would never have cases like translate='yes'+locked='no'.
Just some thoughts...
cheers,
-yves
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]