OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for the editors #001


Thanks Rodolfo, now I do not need to ask separately the question about
group and unit handling in the tree separately. Well noted that this
is in progress..
Cheers
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The tree needs maintenance. There is also a problem with the way the need
> for either a <group> or <unit> is required in <file>.
>
> There are also other known changes to do in the specs/schemas:
>
>
> Review the elements that accept extensions (in the F2F meeting it was
> suggested to remove extensions from <segment>)
> Complete the examples marked as "TODO"
> Add links in the specification documents to the schemes
> Define the members to include in the "Acknowledgements" section (voting
> members?, active members?, whom?)
> Automate the preparation of a zip package for ballot/upload
>
> Regards,
> Rodolfo
> --
> Rodolfo M. Raya
> Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for
> the editors #001
> From: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>
> Date: Thu, October 25, 2012 10:56 am
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
>
> Hi Rodolfo, Yves, all
>
> quality checking the spec to see if I can extract a list of processing
> requirements validation tests. [However I do not want to discuss this now.
> If you wish, please do so in a separate thread.]
>
> This series of numbered threads is meant to ask a single simple question at
> a time. It might happen that they trigger broader discussion but they are
> not intended so :-)
>
> In the tree structures throughout the spec you consistently use
> +---<any> +
>
> IMHO this would mean that implementers must use at least one proprietary
> extension at all extension points, which seems odd
>
> Do we want to say
> +---<any> *
> throughout the spec?
>
> Thanks for your attention
> dF
>
> Legend:
> 1 = one
> + = one or more
> ? = zero or one
> * = zero, one or more
>
>
>
> Dr. David Filip
> =======================
> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
> University of Limerick, Ireland
> telephone: +353-6120-2781
> cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]