OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [xliff] 2.0 Binary Data Module Proposal


Ryan, Bryan, Rodolfo, all

I support the bin unit module, as proposed. I agree that the Sharepoint team provided a valid use case. This even allows for cascaded use of XLIFF, whereas the content owner does not need to bother for complexities of low level extraction at their end. The module while elaborated upon could eventually consider providing some basic tooling for the cascaded handling..

The sole reason why bin unit was dropped was that it did not appear as used in any survey (MIcah Bly, SC surveys, Asanka's corpus - which is however not representative at this point.

I believe that the bin unit scenario will become fairly mainstream with SharePoint 2013.
The average corporate portal user will not have access to good office filters to facilitate extraction, so that the office content will enter the LSP nicely packaged as bin unit..

Microsoft expressed support to the 2.0 migration in a very unambiguous way in Seattle, and I see Ryan's series of proposals as a necessary consequence of that statement.

We should not tell one of our biggest corporate users to stick with 1.2 because 2.0 is not good enough for them.

To be fully comfortable with the proposal I's like to see a second  and third reference implmentation. I can say for LRC that our research platfom SOLAS will implmenet the module support if it makes into the spec. I know that Fredrik like the think and I believe that there should be interest at LIOX eventually other LSPs to consume the bin unit as produced by Sharepoint now and in the future.

@Ryan, I believe that you should populate the wiki with the proposals as suggested by you on behalf of Microsoft in last few days. You see, the cut off meeting is close and there is probably not enough time for discussions before these are added.

Cheers
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie



On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:
Hi Ryan and Rodolfo,

I tired to find the minutes around our binary discussion, but I didn't find that conversation. I recall the discussion went something like "since nobody uses it - it must not be worth supporting."

From my point of view, we've now seen binary used in a very mainstream way.

I think our previous discussion was that it would not be in core. But I see no reason why we shouldn't consider binary as a module. In fact I'd say that's exactly the kind of thing modules are for.

I support this proposal.

Thanks,

Bryan
________________________________
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] on behalf of Rodolfo M. Raya [rmraya@maxprograms.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:35 AM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] 2.0 Binary Data Module Proposal


Hi Ryan,

One of the things we dropped on purpose from XLIFF 2.0 was support for binary stuff. It was agreed that those that need to handle binary pieces can continue using XLIFF 1.2, as upgrading to 2.0 is not mandatory.
Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya
Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [xliff] 2.0 Binary Data Module Proposal
From: Ryan King <ryanki@microsoft.com<mailto:ryanki@microsoft.com>>
Date: Thu, November 15, 2012 10:02 pm
To: "xliff@lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>" <xliff@lists.oasis-open.org<mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org>>

In anticipation of closing down on 2.0, we have two new proposals for modules. In this mail, we are proposing the second of the two, a Binary Data module.

For those who attended the XLIFF Symposium in Seattle, you were given the opportunity to see a *real world* implementation of the <bin-unit> element in SharePoint using XLIFF 1.2. Bryan Schnabel even advocated giving the SharePoint team an award :). Since there is no equivalent of the <bin-unit> in 2.0, this proposal is to add a Binary Data Module.

We think that the 2.0 implementation could be essentially the same as 1.2 with just the elements and attributes used *for now* so the we essentially get it on the 2.0 radar. We may want to propose additional features after we conduct some reviews with the SharePoint team over the next couple of weeks to get their feedback on any improvements they would like to see.

Here is SharePoint’s 1.2 implementation:

      <bin-unit id="fab82e10-02f0-4325-8390-bb10ec086bcc" mime-type="text/plain">
        <bin-source>
          <external-file href="" href="http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation" target="_blank">http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation Packages/redmond_makoscum/fr-fr-Documents-20121115T0733550000Z-0/fr-fr-Documents-0002.txt<http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation%20Packages/redmond_makoscum/fr-fr-Documents-20121115T0733550000Z-0/fr-fr-Documents-0002.txt>" />
        </bin-source>
        <bin-target>
          <external-file href="" href="http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation" target="_blank">http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation Packages/redmond_makoscum/fr-fr-Documents-20121115T0733550000Z-0/fr-fr-Documents-0002.txt<http://sphvm-33449/sites/pub/Translation%20Packages/redmond_makoscum/fr-fr-Documents-20121115T0733550000Z-0/fr-fr-Documents-0002.txt>" />
        </bin-target>
      </bin-unit>


      <bin-unit id="fab82e10-02f0-4325-8390-bb10ec086bcc" mime-type="text/plain">
        <bin-source>
          <internal-file form="base64"><![CDATA[VGhpcyBpcyBhIHRlc3Qu]]></internal-file>
        </bin-source>
        <bin-target>
          <internal-file form="base64"><![CDATA[VGhpcyBpcyBhIHRlc3Qu]]></internal-file>
        </bin-target>
      </bin-unit>

Please let us know your opinions on the proposal.

Thanks,
Microsoft Corporation
(Ryan King, Kevin O'Donnell, Uwe Stahlschmidt, Alan Michael)


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]