[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] 1.2 to 2.0 Gaps and Proposals
> ... A related issue occurred in the discussion between Yves and myself before TC > made the decision on general PRs. Yves thought that it was absurd that only module > implementers can remove module, I argued that this is exactly what we wanted to > achieve and this is what prevailed in the ballot. And on that note David: Following that logic, since none of the modules has currently any PR stating a tool implementing the module can remove the element, technically, once added a module element cannot be removed ...ever. Even by the tool that placed it there. That's the problem with "MUST preserve" at the default level: It forces you to define module-specific PRs where you can't possibly think about everything. That results in default PRs that are simply impossible to enforce. But it's ok, I'm past spending time discussing it. Have a good week-end, -ys
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]