XLIFF 2.0 spec - dF Issue #02 - No PRs in matches module

["Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>]

Dear owner, all.

[P.S.: Since all *.org links stopped working on my machine due to some strange DNS error, I cannot lookup the owner on our wiki :-(]

If there are no PRs, no one will be ever able to delete the module data. This is just the gravest consequence.

Other than that, PRs (and definitions as needed) should be provided that could support a 'naive implementer', i.e. someone without the L10n tribal knowledge.

Other minor issues with this module:

[Please start separate threads if you want to discuss the minor issues..]

02.01)

No terminology match type present.

@Shirley, please make your point separately. It seemed worth to me, while discussing f2f in Redmond

02.02)

Similarity as defined (vaguelly) is irrelevant for MT since MT source is always 100% similar to the unit source, but this is not helpful at all. Instead an MT confidence attribute could be introduced that would also facilitate mapping of MT confidence from ITS 2.0.

ITS 2.0 module is informally planned, but this functionality is a good match for matches and no need to wait for the ITS 2.0 module with this feature..

Cheers

dF 

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie