OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: csprod01 comment 001, improved Format Style Module Processing Requirements

Hi All,


Regarding comment 001, Format Style Module Processing Requirements, I see in the Actions (to be) Taken cell it says “Bryan to add the PR with reference to HTML standard object model.”


I remember we discussed this, but my memory is that we could not determine an appropriate “standard object model.”


And I’m still at a loss to solve this.


If we are talking about the HTML DOM, I think that’s very much overkill. And as we said before, and XML validation against an HTML DTD is also overkill. Even the very handy W3C HTML validator (http://validator.w3.org/ ) fails HTML blurbs that really should pass. For example, if the Format Style Module markup resulted in the following just-in-time HTML snip, it would render nicely in a standard HTML browser (but fail in the validator):








In fact the language in the initial comment was:


“new Processing Requirement: The fs and subFs MUST be configured in such a way that the resulting HTML snippet is valid, such that it can be rendered by a standard HTML browser”


Please let me know if you have advice on what HTML standard object model I should refer to. Or, let me know if you think the language from the initial comment will suffice.






[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]