csprod01 comment 001, improved Format Style Module Processing Requiremen

Hi All,

Regarding comment 001, Format Style Module Processing Requirements, I see in the Actions (to be) Taken cell it says “Bryan to add the PR with reference to HTML standard object model.”

I remember we discussed this, but my memory is that we could not determine an appropriate “standard object model.”

And I’m still at a loss to solve this.

If we are talking about the HTML DOM, I think that’s very much overkill. And as we said before, and XML validation against an HTML DTD is also overkill. Even the very handy W3C HTML validator (http://validator.w3.org/ ) fails HTML blurbs that really should pass. For example, if the Format Style Module markup resulted in the following just-in-time HTML snip, it would render nicely in a standard HTML browser (but fail in the validator):

<html>

<h1>Hello</h1>

<p>World</p>

</html>

In fact the language in the initial comment was:

“new Processing Requirement: The fs and subFs MUST be configured in such a way that the resulting HTML snippet is valid, such that it can be rendered by a standard HTML browser”

Please let me know if you have advice on what HTML standard object model I should refer to. Or, let me know if you think the language from the initial comment will suffice.

Thanks,

Bryan

xliff message