Call for dissent on implementing the general properties sub-properties solution, re csprd 01 comments 021 and 053

["Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>]

Hi all,

As explained in today's meeting, for all property attributes in the spec that have a sub-property specified, such as fs and subFs, state and subState etc.

I have implemented a uniform provision consisting of a Contsraint and a PR

See it here e.g. for state and subState

Constraints

• If the attribute subState is used, the attribute state MUST be specified as well.

Processing Requirements

• If the attribute state is updated, the attribute subState MUST be updated or deleted.

Unless I hear otherwise by Thu, Aug 10, COB PDT, I will consider this our official resolution of the pertaining csprd01 comments.

Best regards

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie