[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 )
Just resending this with an improved Subject line to enhance findability. CFD unchanged. From: Schnabel, Bryan S
I checked and Yves is correct <ignorable> and <em> do not have FS attributes. I propose removing them from the list of elements in the FS section. If I do not receive dissent by the end of the week I will consider this approved. Thanks, Bryan 129:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201310/msg00015.html ignorable and fs Hi all, The section describing the fs:fs attribute says: "Used in: <file>, <unit>, <ignorable>, <notes>, <note>, <originalData>, <data>, <cp>, <sc>, <ec>, <ph>, <pc>, <mrk>, <sm> and <em>." It's incorrect: <ignorable>, <em> do not have fs attributes. Regards, -yves |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]