OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 )

Hi Bryan, Yves,

while I agree that there is no need for fs on em, becuase there will always be a corresponding sm within a unit to karry the fs info

Why not to have it on ignorable, the ignorable could e.g. be made <br/> or what not..

So sure the list needs to agree with the set of elements that actually allow it, but why not ignorable?


Dr. David Filip
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:

Just resending this with an improved Subject line to enhance findability. CFD unchanged.


From: Schnabel, Bryan S
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:23 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Call for dissent: csprd02


I checked and Yves is correct <ignorable> and <em> do not have FS attributes. I propose removing them from the list of elements in the FS section.


If I do not receive dissent by the end of the week I will consider this approved.







Hi all,


The section describing the fs:fs attribute says:


"Used in: <file>, <unit>, <ignorable>, <notes>, <note>, <originalData>, <data>, <cp>, <sc>, <ec>, <ph>, <pc>, <mrk>, <sm> and <em>."


It's incorrect: <ignorable>, <em> do not have fs attributes.





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]