Re: [xliff] Segmentation Modifications

Yves, I quickly checked the files..

toJoin2_out seems not to be joined, the files look the same as the *in file

Other than that the joining behavior seems ok

Few other comments

based on the fragment identifier discussion, we have seen that file ids need to be REQUIRED

It remains to be seen if they can stay NMTOKENs

BTW, I know think they can..

Also translate should not be on segment any longer, as confirmed several minutes ago..

I am in touch with Asanka re publishing notes, so that the number of important consensus resolutions is seen on the mailing list..

Cheers

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

Hi all,

I'm working on implementing the segmentation modification, in this case: un-segmenting.

I've attached several files before (_in) and after (_out). Could you tell me if any of the results is not what you would expect?

The modifications: the tool joins all segments/ignorable elements in each unit as long as the unit has no segment with
canResegment='no'.

Thanks,
-yves

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

xliff message