[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation
> I see... So would the solution be to define dummy > element using the attributes? I misunderstood. You were obviously talking about the bad attribute not being defined (not the good one being used in an element in FS schema). Yes, this makes not much sense for 'lax' to behave like 'skip' if it doesn't find the attribute in the schema. I'll keep looking. -ys -----Original Message----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:42 PM To: 'Tom Comerford'; firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation I see... So would the solution to define dummy element using the attributes? I guess I'll try.