RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

> I see... So would the solution be to define dummy 
> element using the attributes?

I misunderstood. You were obviously talking about the bad attribute not being defined (not the good one being used in an element in
FS schema).

Yes, this makes not much sense for 'lax' to behave like 'skip' if it doesn't find the attribute in the schema.

I'll keep looking.

-ys

-----Original Message-----
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:42 PM
To: 'Tom Comerford'; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation

I see... So would the solution to define dummy element using the attributes?
I guess I'll try.