RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

["Schnabel, Bryan S" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com>]

I think we should take @fs and @subFs off of <ec>. Cannot comment on SLR yet.

I am working on some SLR use case and I must say I'm getting pretty excited about the module in general (sorry for this general statement of support for SLR which does not have any bearing on this thread).
________________________________________
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] on behalf of Yves Savourel [ysavourel@enlaso.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2013 12:54 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

Hi Bryan, Fredrik, all

While working on the validation I've noticed that we have the attributes for the FS and the SLR modules allowed in <sc> and <ec>,
but only in <sm> not in <em>.

Is that normal?

Cheers,
-yves



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php