RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

["Estreen, Fredrik" <Fredrik.Estreen@lionbridge.com>]

Hi Yves, all,

Yes, the equivStorage, sizeInfo and sizeInfoRef are allowed on the <ec> element, but only if the <ec> also has isolated set to yes. The rational is that we need a way to represent the size of the <ec> when it is not paired with a <sc>. And since an isolated <ec> cannot be converted to a <pc> we do not need additional processing requirements when converting a <sc>,<ec> pair into a <pc>. 

The isolated requirement is in the module specification text.

Regards,
Fredrik Estreen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf
> Of Yves Savourel
> Sent: den 8 december 2013 21:24
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
> 
> To be more specific on the SLR attributes. Currently the specifications say:
> 
> On <pc> and <sc>:
> 
> - storageRestriction
> - sizeRestriction
> - equivStorage
> - sizeInfo
> - sizeInfoRef
> 
> On <ec>:
> 
> - equivStorage
> - sizeInfo
> - sizeInfoRef
> 
> On <mrk> and <sm>:
> 
> - storageRestriction
> - sizeRestriction
> 
> On <em>:
> 
> None
> 
> Looking more closely at the definition now, I think it makes sense. But,
> Fredrik, it would be good if you could confirm that it is the expected list.
> Thanks.
> 
> -ys
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schnabel, Bryan S [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 10:07 AM
> To: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
> 
> I think we should take @fs and @subFs off of <ec>. Cannot comment on SLR
> yet.
> 
> I am working on some SLR use case and I must say I'm getting pretty excited
> about the module in general (sorry for this general statement of support for
> SLR which does not have any bearing on this thread).
> ________________________________________
> From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] on behalf of Yves
> Savourel [ysavourel@enlaso.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2013 12:54 PM
> To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em
> 
> Hi Bryan, Fredrik, all
> 
> While working on the validation I've noticed that we have the attributes for
> the FS and the SLR modules allowed in <sc> and <ec>, but only in <sm> not in
> <em>.
> 
> Is that normal?
> 
> Cheers,
> -yves
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>