OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.


Yes, again I misfired. I agree the right elements to allow ctr are "**<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>."

 

That was a typo on my part.

 

But David I don’t understand “this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements.”

 

Can you elaborate, or let me know if this changes my proposal?

 

From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:20 PM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: Schnabel, Bryan S; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.

 

I agree with Yves and also agree that this module should be explicitly allowed on the resulting set of elements

Rgds

dF


Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

 

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

Hi Bryan, Ryan, all,

I'm guessing you meant "in **<file>**, <group> and <unit>" not "in **<xliff>**, <group> and <unit>".

<xliff> has no extension point for elements (and we wouldn't want anything in <xliff> but <file> anyway).

Right?

Cheers,
-yves



-----Original Message-----
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:39 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff] [csprd02 139] CFD: Propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.

Hello,

Ryan and I propose Change Track is allowed on <xliff>, <group>, and <unit>.

This proposal is independent of the issues around modules vs. core in schema, and order of elements (core vs. modules).

If I do not hear dissent by the end of the week I will assume this proposal approved.

Thanks,

Bryan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]