Re: [xliff-comment] RE: csprd02 comment #113

Hi Bryan, all

I response to Bryan's comments I have edited the Inline Section on subflows as follows:

[New text]

Constraints

An inline code containing or delimiting one or more sub-flows must have an attribute subFlows that holds a list of the identifiers of the <unit> elements where the sub-flows are stored.
Sub-Flows must be in the same <file> element as the <unit> element from which they are referenced.

Processing Requirements

Extractors should store each sub-flow in its own <unit> element.
Extractors may order the <unit> elements of the sub-flows and the <unit> element, from where the subflows are referenced, as they see fit.
Other Writers must preserve the order of <unit> elements as initially set by the Extractor.

[Old text]

Processing Requirements

The extraction tool SHOULD store each sub-flow in its own <unit> element.
An inline code containing or delimiting one or more sub-flows MUST have an attribute subFlows that holds a list of the identifiers of the <unit> elements where the sub-flows are stored.
The extraction tool MAY order the <unit> elements of the sub-flows and the <unit> element of their parent in any order it sees fit. User agents coming later in the process MUST keep the <unit>elements in their initial order.

Please note that this is not yet printed.

Please let me know if the edits are OK with you.

Rgds

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Dr. David Filip <David.Filip@ul.ie> wrote:

Thanks, Bryan, I will add a Constraint to subflows stating that subflows MUST not span file elements, than the subflow ids will be automatically unique by the current set of uniqueness constraints
Best regards

dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:

Hi David,

> Do you think that we should explicitly say
> that subflows are not allowed across file elements?

Not a deal breaker, but yes, I think an explicit statement would be appropriate.
________________________________
From: Dr. David Filip [David.Filip@ul.ie]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 8:54 AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org; xliff-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: csprd02 comment #113

Bryan, I own this comment/issue.
In my opinion this issue is addressed by requiring units to be unique within a file.
Do you think that we should explicitly say that subflows are not allowed across file elements?
Thanks
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie<mailto:david.filip@ul.ie>

--
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: xliff-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: xliff-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: xliff-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xliff
Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/

xliff message