Re: [xliff] Proposal to add REQUIRED id (NMTOKEN) to <metadata> and <met

xliff message

Subject: Re: [xliff] Proposal to add REQUIRED id (NMTOKEN) to <metadata> and <metaGroup>

From: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>

To: "Schnabel, Bryan S" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com>

Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:16:32 +0000

I second this proposal, it seems uncontroversial to me.

No referencing of the mda data would be possible w/o a wildcard mechanism that we discarded as an option in the last meeting.

Cheers

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:

As a result of our Fragment Identifier resolution, I propose we a add REQUIRED id (NMTOKEN) attribute to <metadata> and <metaGroup>.

Please let me know if you disagree. If this turns out to be noncontroversial, I will ask for a second at the meeting tomorrow.

Thanks,

Bryan