RE: [xliff] CSPRD03 #237: mtc:match default attribute value is missing

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

Quite right: I see it now.

+1

 

Thanks,

-yves

 

 

From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tom Comerford
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:47 PM
To: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] CSPRD03 #237: mtc:match default attribute value is missing

 

Yves,

 

It seems that some of the intended keystrokes remained in my brain, where apparently you couldn’t see them. Sorry for the omission.

 

To state it more completely: The element mtc:match has an attribute ‘reference’. In the spec, its default is ‘no’ but this isn’t reflected in the schema. The proposed solution is to add the missing default value.

 

Regards,

 

Tom

 

 

From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:12 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] CSPRD03 #237: mtc:match default attribute value is missing

 

Hi Tom,

 

Sorry: I’m probably missing something.

What default value ‘no’ are you talking about?

mtc:match has quite a few attributes but none seem to have default values (or have a ‘no’ value).

 

Thanks,

-yves

 

 

From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tom Comerford
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:08 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff] CSPRD03 #237: mtc:match default attribute value is missing

 

CSPRD03 #237: For mtc:match, the schema doesn’t reflect the specified default value ‘no’.

 

I propose to add the missing default value, unless I hear dissent by the end of the week.

 

Thanks,

 

Tom