[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Discussion re csprd03 209
I would propose to drop ‘NMTOKEN’ from your proposed changed. (no need to get to get overly technical) The new text would be: Value description: Name of any valid XLIFF element which is a sibling, or a child of a sibling element, to the change track module within the scope of the enclosing element. From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie] Yves, thanks for pointing to Tom's CFD, the solution seems OK with me. I can se that the ctr module now references its own appliesTo. I would just make a minor change in its value description OLD: Value description: Any valid XLIFF element which is a sibling, or a child of a sibling element, to the change track module within the scope of the enclosing element. NEW: Value description: NMTOKEN name of any valid XLIFF element which is a sibling, or a child of a sibling element, to the change track module within the scope of the enclosing element. How does that sound. The value cannot obviously be the element itself, so this seems an obvious editorial clarification Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: Hi David,
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]