[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Survey/SUO feedback
[XLIFF-2.0]
XLIFF Version 2.0. Edited by Tom Comerford, David Filip, Rodolfo M. Raya, and Yves Savourel. 31 March 2014. OASIS Committee Specification 01. http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/cs01/xliff-core-v2.0-cs01.html. The latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html.
I understand that the SOU MAY be used by the XLIFF TC [TC link] to progress the Committee Specification to OASIS standard.
This is the specification linkAgain, this is not yet life, but should become bfeore we start collecting the SOUsThe spec should be identified using this block[XLIFF-2.0]
XLIFF Version 2.0. Edited by Tom Comerford, David Filip, Rodolfo M. Raya, and Yves Savourel. 31 March 2014. OASIS Committee Specification 01. http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/cs01/xliff-core-v2.0-cs01.html. The latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.0/xliff-core-v2.0.html.
Dr. David Filip=======================LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSISUniversity of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781cellphone: +353-86-0222-158facsimile: +353-6120-2734mailto: david.filip@ul.ieOn Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dr. David Filip <David.Filip@ul.ie> wrote:
Yves, thanks for this, very useful. especially the boiler plate, date and spec link.These indeed need to be added to fulfill the OASIS SOU requirementCheersdFDr. David Filip=======================LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSISUniversity of Limerick, Irelandtelephone: +353-6120-2781cellphone: +353-86-0222-158facsimile: +353-6120-2734mailto: david.filip@ul.ieOn Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:Hi Lucia,
A few notes on the survey/SUO:
- in " Does your tool prevent the creation of duplicated trans-unit IDs? " we should have 'unit' not 'trans-unit'
- "21. Please select from the following required XLIFF attributes the ones that your tool can process:" list only some of the
<xliff> element (trgLang is missing)
- " 17. Which XLIFF version does your tool support?" : I assume we will remove all version but 2.0?
- There should be a place for people to provide links to their implementation, extra info, etc. (a field labeled as such, not as a
general comment area).
- All SOU I see at OASIS are looking like explicit statements, (see
https://www.oasis-open.org/search/google/statment%20of%20use?query=statment%20of%20use) maybe we need a boiler plate text field for
this. Something like:
[ ] do you want to make this survey response an official SUO
And if yes, move to a page with the boilerplate text and a field for the name of the person/organization doing the statement
and a check box saying 'I agree'.
Or something similar.
I think we also need the version and date of the spec stated somewhere.
-ys
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]