[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Ignorables
Hi Yves, Thank you for your answer. One more question – if you have two ignorables side-by-side, may they be merged together, or must they always remain independent items. Thanks, www.sdl.com
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
Hi Ingo, Yes, you can have ignorable elements mixed anywhere with segment elements, including several side-by-side. Usually ignorable would be used for non-translatabled “things” between segments. There are to some degree the equivalent of the possible spans of content between <mrk mtype='seg'>
of 1.2. They have the same model as a <segment>, so you need to take them into account for any operation that goes across all the parts of a <unit>, like re-ordering segments, computing
non-translatable spans of content (the source of one ignorable can have a <sm translate='no'> that ends in two segments after for example), etc. I hope this helps, -yves From:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Ingo Prause Hi, I have a question about ignorables. Can you have two ignorables side-by-side (or would you usually just have one at start/between segments/or at end and what are the processing requirements for ignorables?
Thanks, Ingo Prause
| Principal Developer | SDL | (t) +353 (01) 20 50 305
SDL Global Solutions (Ireland) Limited | La Vallee House, Upper Dargle Road, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland | Registered in Ireland, Number 135925
This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
www.websense.com Click
here to report this email as spam. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]