[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Call For Dissent: Inline Markup within Change Tracking <item />
All My Use Case was only for tracking inline markup in source and target so apologies for not taking a more holistic view of the change. You are correct though. If
“segment” is allowed in appliesTo attribute then you would need a way to identify which segment the change referred to. Phil From: David Filip [mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie]
Thanks, Yves, sorry my bad, I should have downloded the xsd before commenting. I have now created a branche with Phil's proposal on the SVN I can see that only inlines are now allowed on the change track xsd proposed by Phil Now, ctr is allowed on all structural levels presumably because of notes. The applies to has the power to reference any sibling or cousin (child of sibling). So the revisions on <unit> can reference <segment>, <source> or <target>. The current proposed schema covers the case of tracking <source> or <target>. If someone wanted to change track a <segment> they couldn't do that without <source> and <target> also allowed on <item>. I think it could and should be also used for tracking of segmentation changes. This could be probably done if the segment data model is also allowed.. But <segements> don't have required id and also the segment structure is transient, so I guess the tracking of segmentation changes would be best done if everything up to and including <unit> was allowed on <item>. Disregarding that, we will need some advanced constraints for the prose spec and sch schemas, such as that xlf: elements are not allowed on <item> when tracking <note> elements and maybe more.. this is just the first that comes to mind.. Cheers dF
Dr. David Filip =========== OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer Spokes Research Fellow ADAPT Centre KDEG, Trinity College Dublin Mobile: +420-777-218-122 On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]